Ferrari 456M
Car comparison
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12vsTVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTVR Cerbera
4.5 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight387 hp/t289 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful442 hp330 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best estimated range509 km316 mi
- Best performance score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 442hp330kW | 426hp318kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 515Nm380lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,100kg2,425lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.4s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 37.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.6L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 35.1L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 387hp/t289kW/t176hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated | 468Nm/t313lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 509km316mi Calculated | 433km269mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,474cc334cu in | 4,475cc273cu in |
| Length | 4,763mm188in | 4,280mm169in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,220mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,565mm101in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,465mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,470mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 316L | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 110L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 495g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
- TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 6,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 12.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW |
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 has 16 hp more than TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 5.2 s |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 3.9 s |
Although Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 has more power, TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 6.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 387 hp/t 289 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 509 km 316 mi |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 433 km 269 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW | 3.9 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 |
| 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
| TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | 387 hp/t 289 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | TVRCerbera4.5 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 442 hp 330 kW | 426 hp 318 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 509 km 316 mi | 433 km 269 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 495 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 316 L 11.2 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 387 hp/t 289 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 | TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.6 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.80 LC100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 60.83 LC100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,240 L856 US gal713 UK gal | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,670 LC/year | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Has 53 km/h (33 mph) higher top speed
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
TVR Cerbera 4.5 i V8
- Is 590 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 126 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 74 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























