Maserati 3200 GT
Car comparison
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VvsTVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTVR Cerbera
4.0 i 24V Speed Six
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque491 Nm362 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range600 km373 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score51/100
TVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Lightest1,130 kg2,491 lb
- Best power-to-weight310 hp/t231 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk390 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 447Nm330lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,130kg2,491lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 50.9s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 310hp/t231kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | 433km269mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,510mm178in | 4,280mm169in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,220mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,566mm101in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,464mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
- TVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 13.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 191 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 350 hp 261 kW |
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has 20 hp more than TVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six.
The biggest power difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 447 Nm 330 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 273 km/h 170 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 5.1 s |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 4.4 s |
Although Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has more power, TVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 600 km 373 mi |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 433 km 269 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.4 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.0 i 24V Speed Six | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 447 Nm 330 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | 433 km 269 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 44 Nm more
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
TVR Cerbera 4.0 i 24V Speed Six
- Is 460 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 77 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























