Maserati 3200 GT
Car comparison
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VvsMaserati Khamsin 4.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Khamsin
4.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque491 Nm362 lb-ft
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range600 km373 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score67/100
Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8
- Largest trunk400 L
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 90.3s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 20.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 21L/100 km11.2mpg US13.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | 429km266mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 4,930cc301cu in |
| Length | 4,510mm178in | 4,400mm173in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,140mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,550mm100in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,440mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,468mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 400L |
| Max trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 20.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has 50 hp more than Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8 and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 5.1 s |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V and Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V and Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: 6.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 600 km 373 mi |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 429 km 266 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.8 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 |
| 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | 429 km 266 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK | 21 L/100 km11.2 mpg US13.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km | 36.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi | 59.14 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal | 3,150 L832 US gal693 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year | 5,513 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 11 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 171 km (107 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8
- Has 180 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























