Car comparison

Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VvsMaserati Khamsin 4.9 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati 3200 GT

3.2 Biturbo V8 32V

370 hp3217 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1998-2002
VS

Maserati Khamsin

4.9 V8

320 hp4930 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1973-1982

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    290 km/h
    180 mph Unrestricted
    280 km/h
    174 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    370 hp
    276 kW
  • Highest torque
    491 Nm
    362 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,590 kg
    3,505 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    233 hp/t
    174 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    15.0 L/100 km
    15.7 mpg US
    18.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    600 km
    373 mi
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    75/100
  • Best economy score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32VMaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
Power
370hp276kW
320hp239kW
Torque
491Nm362lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,590kg3,505lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Gross weight
1,940kg4,277lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
275 km/h
171 mph
To 99% top speed
74.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
90.3s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.1s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
16.0s
Calculated
20.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.9s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK
21L/100 km11.2mpg US13.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton
Calculated
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
600km373mi
Calculated
429km266mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,217cc196cu in
4,930cc301cu in
Length
4,510mm178in
4,400mm173in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,804mm71in
Height
1,310mm52in
1,140mm45in
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
2,550mm100in
Front track
1,525mm60in
1,440mm57in
Rear track
1,538mm61in
1,468mm58in
Trunk volume-
400L
Max trunk volume
220L
-
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
90L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VMaserati Khamsin 4.9 V8PowerTorque
  • Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V6,250 rpm4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V85,500 rpm4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32VMaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.9 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.1 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.0 s
20.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
275 km/h
171 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
13.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
112 mph
168 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
370 hp
276 kW
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
320 hp
239 kW

Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has 50 hp more than Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8 and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
491 Nm
362 lb-ft
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
1,690 kg
3,726 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
275 km/h
171 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V5.1 s
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V85.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V and Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
21.0 L/100 km
11.2 mpg US
13.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V and Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: 6.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
600 km
373 mi
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
429 km
266 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
370 hp
276 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
320 hp
239 kW
5.8 s
275 km/h
171 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
Power
370 hp
276 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,510 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,310 mm
51.6 in
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,140 mm
44.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
Power
370 hp
276 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
21.0 L/100 km
11.2 mpg US
13.5 mpg UK

Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
5.1 s
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
21.0 L/100 km
11.2 mpg US
13.5 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
21.0 L/100 km
11.2 mpg US
13.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32VMaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8
Power
370 hp
276 kW
320 hp
239 kW
Torque
491 Nm
362 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.1 s
5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
275 km/h
171 mph
Lightness
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
1,690 kg
3,726 lb
Fuel consumption
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
21.0 L/100 km
11.2 mpg US
13.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,510 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,310 mm
51.6 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,140 mm
44.9 in
Range score
600 km
373 mi
429 km
266 mi
Trunk score
220 L
7.8 cu ft
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VMaserati Khamsin 4.9 V8
Consumption15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK21 L/100 km11.2 mpg US13.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km26.25 LC100 km36.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi42.25 LC100 mi59.14 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal3,150 L832 US gal693 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,938 LC/year5,513 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V

  • Has 50 hp more
  • Has 11 Nm more
  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 171 km (107 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8

  • Has 180 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V vs Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster