Maserati Khamsin
Car comparison
Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8vsBMW M1 (E26) 3.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M1 (E26)
3.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M1 (E26) 3.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight213 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range899 km559 mi
- Best economy score72/100
Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8
- Fastest top speed275 km/h171 mph
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | BMWM1 (E26)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 277hp207kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Gross weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.3s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated | 82.5s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.2s Calculated | 20.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21L/100 km11.2mpg US13.5mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 429km266mi Calculated | 899km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,930cc301cu in | 3,453cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,400mm173in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,140mm45in | 1,140mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,560mm101in |
| Front track | 1,440mm57in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,468mm58in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 116L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M1 (E26) 3.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 6,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | BMWM1 (E26)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.2 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 277 hp 207 kW |
Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8 has 43 hp more than BMW M1 (E26) 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 and Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 5.8 s |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 5.6 s |
Although Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8 has more power, BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 and Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 and Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8: 8.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 429 km 266 mi |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 899 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.8 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 277 hp 207 kW | 5.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 |
| 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK |
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiKhamsin4.9 V8 | BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 277 hp 207 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.0 L/100 km 11.2 mpg US 13.5 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 429 km 266 mi | 899 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8 | BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21 L/100 km11.2 mpg US13.5 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 36.75 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 59.14 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,150 L832 US gal693 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,513 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Khamsin 4.9 V8
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M1 (E26) 3.5
- Is 390 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 8.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 471 km (292 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























