BMW M1 (E26)
Car comparison
BMW M1 (E26) 3.5vsBMW 6 Series (E24) · Facelift 1982 M 635CSi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series (E24) · Facelift 1982
M 635CSi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score49/100
BMW M1 (E26) 3.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight213 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range899 km559 mi
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 277hp207kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 90.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 899km559mi Calculated | 619km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,453cc211cu in | 3,453cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,140mm45in | 1,355mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,560mm101in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,430mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,464mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 116L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M1 (E26) 3.5: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 6,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 277 hp 207 kW |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi has 9 hp more than BMW M1 (E26) 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 and BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 5.6 s |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 6.4 s |
Although BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi has more power, BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 and BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi and BMW M1 (E26) 3.5: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 899 km 559 mi |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 619 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 277 hp 207 kW | 5.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.4 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM1 (E26)3.5 | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 277 hp 207 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 899 km 559 mi | 619 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M1 (E26) 3.5 | BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M1 (E26) 3.5
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 280 km (174 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























