Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300vsLynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)

C 300

258 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2021-present
VS

Lynk & Co 03

+ 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    258 hp
    192 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    161 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    455 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Power
258hp192kW
254hp189kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,620kg3,571lb
Gross weight
2,280kg5,027lb
2,100kg4,630lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
17.9s
Calculated
18.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
649km403mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,751mm187in
4,677mm184in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,437mm57in
1,461mm58in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,587mm62in
Rear track
1,613mm64in
1,587mm62in
Ground clearance-
132mm5in
Trunk volume
455L
414L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 3005,800 rpm2,000-3,200 rpm6,050 rpm
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.9 s
18.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
13.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
175 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
258 hp
192 kW
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 has 4 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
1,620 kg
3,571 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 3006.0 s
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T55.9 s

Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 has more power, Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
714 km
444 mi
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
649 km
403 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
258 hp
192 kW
6.0 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,677 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
6.0 s
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Power
258 hp
192 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,677 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
649 km
403 mi
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 41 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 300
C 300
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300
+ 2.0TD T5
330i
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)330i
C 300
C 300
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300
+ 2.0TD T5
C 300
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
C 300
C 300
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 300
+ 2.0TD T5
730i
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019730i
C 300
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
C 300
AMG C 36
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36
+ 2.0TD T5
E 300
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 300
C 300
C 300
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300
+ 2.0TD T5
P250
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
C 300
AMG C 43 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 vs Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster