Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
AMG C 43 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 4,266cc260cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,516mm178in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,723mm68in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,387mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,509mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,483mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 280g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 5,800 rpm | 2,000-3,200 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 5,850 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,100 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 has 48 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 6.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 6.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 714 km 444 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 280 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 184 km (115 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























