Lynk & Co 03
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 300d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
C 300d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range759 km472 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 58.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 18.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 321Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 759km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,677mm184in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 414L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | - | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 2,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 18.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 245 hp 183 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 5.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 649 km 403 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 759 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 759 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
- Has 9 hp more
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 km (68 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























