Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200vsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
2.0TD T4 Evo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque325 Nm240 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score91/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 325Nm240lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,515kg5,545lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 56.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.4s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 846km526mi Calculated | 847km527mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,949mm195in | 4,684mm184in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,469mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,961mm117in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,629mm64in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,643mm65in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 5,800 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.4 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 218 hp 163 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200 and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 325 Nm 240 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.6 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 846 km 526 mi |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 847 km 527 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 325 Nm 240 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 846 km 526 mi | 847 km 527 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200 | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 126 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1 km (1 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























