Car comparison

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 · Stage 3vsLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 · Stage 2vsLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 · Stage 1vsLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback

2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)

381 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2021-present
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback

2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)

330 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2021-present
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback

2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)

300 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2021-present
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback

2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    269 km/h
    167 mph
  • Most powerful
    381 hp
    284 kW
  • Highest torque
    543 Nm
    400 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,590 kg
    3,505 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    240 hp/t
    179 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    685 km
    426 mi
  • Largest trunk
    330 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    75/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
Power
381hp284kW+127 hp
330hp246kW+76 hp
300hp224kW+46 hp
254hp189kW
Torque
543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm
473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm
427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,590kg3,505lb
1,590kg3,505lb
1,590kg3,505lb
1,590kg3,505lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
2,000kg4,409lb
2,000kg4,409lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
+29 km/h
258 km/h
160 mph
+18 km/h
251 km/h
156 mph
+11 km/h
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
60.0s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-15.6 s
Calculated
65.5s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-10.1 s
Calculated
69.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-6.4 s
Calculated
75.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s-1.4 s
5.3s-0.9 s
5.6s-0.6 s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
15.7s-9.5 s
Calculated
18.4s-6.7 s
Calculated
20.6s-4.5 s
Calculated
25.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s-1.3 s
Calculated
5.0s-0.9 s
Calculated
5.3s-0.6 s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s-1.5 s
Calculated
13.4s-1.0 s
Calculated
13.7s-0.6 s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb
Calculated
208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton
Calculated
297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton
Calculated
269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
685km426mi
Calculated
685km426mi
Calculated
685km426mi
Calculated
685km426mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,458mm176in
4,458mm176in
4,458mm176in
4,458mm176in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,530mm60in
1,530mm60in
1,530mm60in
1,530mm60in
Wheelbase
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,588mm63in
1,588mm63in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,608mm63in
1,608mm63in
1,608mm63in
1,608mm63in
Ground clearance
151mm6in
151mm6in
151mm6in
151mm6in
Trunk volume
330L
330L
330L
330L
Max trunk volume
842L
842L
842L
842L
Doors
5
5
5
5
Seats
5
5
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
50L
50L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hpLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2) 330 hpLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1) 300 hpLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 254 hpPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2) 330 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1) 300 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 254 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp5,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp5,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp5,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp5,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
5.0 s
5.3 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
5.3 s
5.6 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.7 s
18.4 s
20.6 s
25.2 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
258 km/h
160 mph
251 km/h
156 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.9 s
6.0 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.8 s
9.0 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
11.3 s
11.6 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.4 s
13.7 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
183 km/h
113 mph
174 km/h
108 mph
169 km/h
105 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
381 hp
284 kW
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
330 hp
246 kW
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
300 hp
224 kW
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
254 hp
189 kW

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp has 127 hp more than Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 254 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 254 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp: 127 hp (95 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
543 Nm
400 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
473 Nm
348 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
427 Nm
315 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
1,590 kg
3,505 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
269 km/h
167 mph
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
258 km/h
160 mph
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
251 km/h
156 mph
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp4.8 s
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp5.3 s
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp5.6 s
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp6.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 254 hp: 1.4 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2) 330 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1) 300 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
240 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
685 km
426 mi
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
685 km
426 mi
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
685 km
426 mi
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
685 km
426 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
381 hp
284 kW
4.8 s
269 km/h
167 mph
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
330 hp
246 kW
5.3 s
258 km/h
160 mph
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
300 hp
224 kW
5.6 s
251 km/h
156 mph
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
254 hp
189 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
Power
381 hp
284 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,530 mm
60.2 in
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,530 mm
60.2 in
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
251 km/h
156 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,530 mm
60.2 in
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,530 mm
60.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
Power
381 hp
284 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
251 km/h
156 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
4.8 s
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.3 s
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.6 s
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp
240 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hpLynk & Co02 I Hatchback2.0TD T5254 hp
Power
381 hp
284 kW
330 hp
246 kW
300 hp
224 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
543 Nm
400 lb-ft
473 Nm
348 lb-ft
427 Nm
315 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
5.3 s
5.6 s
6.2 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
258 km/h
160 mph
251 km/h
156 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,530 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,530 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,530 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,530 mm
60.2 in
Range score
685 km
426 mi
685 km
426 mi
685 km
426 mi
685 km
426 mi
Trunk score
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
240 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hpLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2) 330 hpLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1) 300 hpLynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 254 hp
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,916 LC/year1,916 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp

  • Has 51 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
5.0 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
R 5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
90 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
70 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
8.3 V16
3.0 V6
VS
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
4.7 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12
Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 · Stage 3 vs Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 · Stage 2 vs Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 · Stage 1 vs Lynk & Co 02 I Hatchback 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster