Car comparison

Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD · Stage 3vsLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD · Stage 2vsLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD · Stage 1vsLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I

2.0TD (Stage 3)

285 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I

2.0TD (Stage 2)

247 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I

2.0TD (Stage 1)

224 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I

2.0TD

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    285 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    465 Nm
    343 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,570 kg
    3,461 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    182 hp/t
    135 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    781 km
    485 mi
  • Largest trunk
    330 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
Power
285hp213kW+95 hp
247hp184kW+57 hp
224hp167kW+34 hp
190hp142kW
Torque
465Nm343lb-ft+165 Nm
405Nm299lb-ft+105 Nm
366Nm270lb-ft+66 Nm
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,570kg3,461lb
1,570kg3,461lb
1,570kg3,461lb
1,570kg3,461lb
Gross weight
1,980kg4,365lb
1,980kg4,365lb
1,980kg4,365lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
+25 km/h
233 km/h
145 mph
+13 km/h
226 km/h
140 mph
+6 km/h
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph-15.4 s
Calculated
70.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph-11.1 s
Calculated
73.8s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph-8.1 s
Calculated
82.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s-1.8 s
6.6s-1.2 s
7.0s-0.8 s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
22.1s-16.4 s
Calculated
27.0s-11.5 s
Calculated
31.2s-7.2 s
Calculated
38.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s-1.6 s
Calculated
6.3s-1.1 s
Calculated
6.7s-0.7 s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s-1.5 s
Calculated
14.7s-1.0 s
Calculated
15.0s-0.6 s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
182hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton
Calculated
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
781km485mi
Calculated
781km485mi
Calculated
781km485mi
Calculated
781km485mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,448mm175in
4,448mm175in
4,448mm175in
4,448mm175in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,572mm62in
1,572mm62in
1,572mm62in
1,572mm62in
Wheelbase
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,591mm63in
1,591mm63in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,616mm64in
1,616mm64in
1,616mm64in
1,616mm64in
Ground clearance
201mm8in
201mm8in
201mm8in
201mm8in
Trunk volume
330L
330L
330L
330L
Max trunk volume
842L
842L
842L
842L
Doors
5
5
5
5
Seats
5
5
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
50L
50L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hpLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 2) 247 hpLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 1) 224 hpLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD 190 hpPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 2) 247 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 1) 224 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD 190 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp4,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp4,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp4,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp4,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.3 s
6.7 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.6 s
7.0 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.1 s
27.0 s
31.2 s
38.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.4 s
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.6 s
9.8 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.4 s
12.7 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.7 s
15.0 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
158 km/h
98 mph
154 km/h
95 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
285 hp
213 kW
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
247 hp
184 kW
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
224 hp
167 kW
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
190 hp
142 kW

Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp has 95 hp more than Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD 190 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD 190 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp: 95 hp (71 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
465 Nm
343 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
405 Nm
299 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
366 Nm
270 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
1,570 kg
3,461 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
245 km/h
152 mph
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
233 km/h
145 mph
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
226 km/h
140 mph
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp6.1 s
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp6.6 s
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp7.0 s
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD 190 hp: 1.8 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 2) 247 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 1) 224 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
182 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
781 km
485 mi
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
781 km
485 mi
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
781 km
485 mi
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
781 km
485 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
285 hp
213 kW
6.1 s
245 km/h
152 mph
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
247 hp
184 kW
6.6 s
233 km/h
145 mph
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
224 hp
167 kW
7.0 s
226 km/h
140 mph
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
Power
247 hp
184 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
Power
247 hp
184 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.1 s
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.6 s
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp
182 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 3)285 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 2)247 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD (Stage 1)224 hpLynk & Co02 I2.0TD190 hp
Power
285 hp
213 kW
247 hp
184 kW
224 hp
167 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
465 Nm
343 lb-ft
405 Nm
299 lb-ft
366 Nm
270 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.6 s
7.0 s
7.8 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Range score
781 km
485 mi
781 km
485 mi
781 km
485 mi
781 km
485 mi
Trunk score
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
182 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hpLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 2) 247 hpLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 1) 224 hpLynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD 190 hp
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,680 LC/year1,680 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
5.0 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
R 5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
90 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
70 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
8.3 V16
3.0 V6
VS
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
4.7 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12
Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD · Stage 3 vs Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD · Stage 2 vs Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD · Stage 1 vs Lynk & Co 02 I 2.0TD - car comparison - FastVsFaster