Car comparison

Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD · Stage 3vsLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD · Stage 2vsLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD · Stage 1vsLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I

1.5TD (Stage 3)

270 hp1477 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I

1.5TD (Stage 2)

234 hp1477 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I

1.5TD (Stage 1)

212 hp1477 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS
Lynk & Co logo

Lynk & Co 02 I

1.5TD

180 hp1477 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    270 hp
    201 kW
  • Highest torque
    411 Nm
    303 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,535 kg
    3,384 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    176 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    781 km
    485 mi
  • Largest trunk
    330 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
Power
270hp201kW+90 hp
234hp174kW+54 hp
212hp158kW+32 hp
180hp134kW
Torque
411Nm303lb-ft+146 Nm
358Nm264lb-ft+93 Nm
323Nm238lb-ft+58 Nm
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,535kg3,384lb
1,535kg3,384lb
1,535kg3,384lb
1,535kg3,384lb
Gross weight
1,910kg4,211lb
1,910kg4,211lb
1,910kg4,211lb
1,910kg4,211lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
+45 km/h
Calculated
229 km/h
142 mph
+24 km/h
222 km/h
138 mph
+17 km/h
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
73.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-4.6 s
Calculated
74.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph-4.2 s
Calculated
77.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph-1.2 s
Calculated
78.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s-1.9 s
7.1s-1.3 s
7.5s-0.8 s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
23.0s-38.1 s
Calculated
30.0s-31.1 s
Calculated
35.1s-25.9 s
Calculated
61.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s-1.7 s
Calculated
6.7s-1.2 s
Calculated
7.1s-0.7 s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s-1.6 s
Calculated
15.0s-1.0 s
Calculated
15.4s-0.6 s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
152hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
781km485mi
Calculated
781km485mi
Calculated
781km485mi
Calculated
781km485mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,477cc90cu in
1,477cc90cu in
1,477cc90cu in
1,477cc90cu in
Length
4,448mm175in
4,448mm175in
4,448mm175in
4,448mm175in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,572mm62in
1,572mm62in
1,572mm62in
1,572mm62in
Wheelbase
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,591mm63in
1,591mm63in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,616mm64in
1,616mm64in
1,616mm64in
1,616mm64in
Ground clearance
201mm8in
201mm8in
201mm8in
201mm8in
Trunk volume
330L
330L
330L
330L
Max trunk volume
842L
842L
842L
842L
Doors
5
5
5
5
Seats
5
5
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
50L
50L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hpLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 2) 234 hpLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 1) 212 hpLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD 180 hpPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 2) 234 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 1) 212 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD 180 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp5,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp5,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp5,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp5,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.7 s
7.1 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
7.1 s
7.5 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.0 s
30.0 s
35.1 s
61.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
229 km/h
142 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.9 s
10.1 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.7 s
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
15.0 s
15.4 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
154 km/h
96 mph
150 km/h
93 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
270 hp
201 kW
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
234 hp
174 kW
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
212 hp
158 kW
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
180 hp
134 kW

Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp has 90 hp more than Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD 180 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD 180 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp: 90 hp (67 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
358 Nm
264 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
323 Nm
238 lb-ft
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
1,535 kg
3,384 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
229 km/h
142 mph
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
222 km/h
138 mph
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp6.4 s
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp7.1 s
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp7.5 s
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp8.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD 180 hp: 1.9 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 2) 234 hp and Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 1) 212 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
781 km
485 mi
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
781 km
485 mi
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
781 km
485 mi
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
781 km
485 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
270 hp
201 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
234 hp
174 kW
7.1 s
229 km/h
142 mph
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
212 hp
158 kW
7.5 s
222 km/h
138 mph
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
180 hp
134 kW
8.3 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
Power
234 hp
174 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
Power
212 hp
158 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
Power
234 hp
174 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
Power
212 hp
158 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 s
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.1 s
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.5 s
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 3)270 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 2)234 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD (Stage 1)212 hpLynk & Co02 I1.5TD180 hp
Power
270 hp
201 kW
234 hp
174 kW
212 hp
158 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
358 Nm
264 lb-ft
323 Nm
238 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
7.1 s
7.5 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,448 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Range score
781 km
485 mi
781 km
485 mi
781 km
485 mi
781 km
485 mi
Trunk score
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hpLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 2) 234 hpLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 1) 212 hpLynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD 180 hp
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,680 LC/year1,680 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp

  • Has 36 hp more
  • Has 53 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
5.0 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
R 5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
90 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
70 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
8.3 V16
3.0 V6
VS
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
4.7 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12
Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD · Stage 3 vs Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD · Stage 2 vs Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD · Stage 1 vs Lynk & Co 02 I 1.5TD - car comparison - FastVsFaster