Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsLynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Lynk & Co 01

1.5 T3

180 hp1477 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,575 kg
    3,472 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.7 L/100 km
    138.4 mpg US
    166.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,575kg3,472lb
1,769kg3,900lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
-
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
79.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
77.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
38.8s
Calculated
47.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
1.7L/100 km138.4mpg US166.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,041km647mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,477cc90cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,512mm178in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,857mm73in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,673mm66in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,734mm108in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,592mm63in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
-
Max trunk volume
1,390L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
-
CO2 emissions
130g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3PowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
Lynk & Co011.5 T35,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.8 s
47.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has 10 hp more than Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1,769 kg
3,900 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
218 km/h
135 mph
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.07.6 s
Lynk & Co011.5 T37.3 s

Although Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has more power, Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW
7.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.6 s
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Range score
1,041 km
647 mi
-
CO2 score
130 g/km
-
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK1.7 L/100 km138.4 mpg US166.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km2.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi4.79 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal255 L67 US gal56 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year446.25 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 95 Nm more
  • Is 194 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
1.5 T3
2.2d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
1.5 T3
GLA 220d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
Cooper SD 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
1.5 T3
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
1.5 T3
2.0 TDI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
40 TFSI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.5 T3
20d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsBMWX1 (F48)20d
1.5 T3
2.0 D4
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolvoXC402.0 D4
1.5 T3
2.0 TDI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster