Car comparison

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3vsVolvo XC40 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 01

1.5 T3

180 hp1477 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Volvo XC40

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.7 L/100 km
    138.4 mpg US
    166.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Volvo XC40 2.0 D4

  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,728 kg
    3,810 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    110 hp/t
    82 kW/t
    9.1 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co011.5 T3VolvoXC402.0 D4
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,769kg3,900lb
1,728kg3,810lb
Gross weight-
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
77.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
84.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
47.1s
Calculated
51.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1.7L/100 km138.4mpg US166.2mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,059km658mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,477cc90cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,512mm178in
4,425mm174in
Width
1,857mm73in
1,863mm73in
Height
1,673mm66in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,734mm108in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,592mm63in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,597mm63in
1,626mm64in
Ground clearance
211mm8in
211mm8in
Trunk volume-
460L
Max trunk volume-
1,336L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
54L
CO2 emissions-
133g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3Volvo XC40 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co011.5 T35,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC402.0 D44,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co011.5 T3VolvoXC402.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.1 s
51.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW
VolvoXC402.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
VolvoXC402.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
VolvoXC402.0 D4
1,728 kg
3,810 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
210 km/h
130 mph
VolvoXC402.0 D4
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T37.3 s
VolvoXC402.0 D47.9 s

Although Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 has more power, Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC402.0 D4
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW
7.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph
VolvoXC402.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
VolvoXC402.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolvoXC402.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 D4
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co011.5 T3VolvoXC402.0 D4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.9 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
1,728 kg
3,810 lb
Fuel consumption
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
-
1,059 km
658 mi
CO2 score
-
133 g/km
Trunk score
-
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 01 1.5 T3Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
Consumption1.7 L/100 km138.4 mpg US166.2 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km2.98 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi4.79 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used255 L67 US gal56 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost446.25 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Volvo XC40 2.0 D4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 135 Nm more
  • Is 41 kg lighter
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 T3
2.2d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC402.0 D4vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
1.5 T3
GLA 220d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC402.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
1.5 T3
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 D4vsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
1.5 T3
2.0 TDI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
1.5 T3
20d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsBMWX1 (F48)20d
2.0 D4
40 TDI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 D4vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 D4
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
VolvoXC402.0 D4vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 D4
40 TDI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1.5 T3
2.0d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 vs Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster