Techrules Ren
Car comparison
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWhvsLotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora Sport 410
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful1,305 hp973 kW
- Best power-to-weight801 hp/t597 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,067 km663 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score40/100
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Lightest1,325 kg2,921 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,305hp973kW | 410hp306kW |
| Torque | - | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,325kg2,921lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 36.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 59.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.0s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 801hp/t597kW/t363hp/1000 lb Calculated | 309hp/t231kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,067km663mi Calculated | 619km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,694mm185in | - |
| Width | 2,048mm81in | - |
| Height | 1,200mm47in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,724mm107in | - |
| Front track | 1,818mm72in | - |
| Rear track | 1,808mm71in | - |
| Doors | 1 | 2 |
| Seats | 3 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.0 s | 12.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 230 km/h 143 mph | 197 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,305 hp 973 kW |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh has 895 hp more than Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh: 895 hp (667 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 3.0 s |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 801 hp/t 597 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,067 km 663 mi |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,305 hp 973 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.2 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 801 hp/t 597 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,305 hp 973 kW | 410 hp 306 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 300 km/h 186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,067 km 663 mi | 619 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 801 hp/t 597 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh | Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh
- Has 895 hp more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 491 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 448 km (278 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Is 305 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























