McLaren Speedtail
Car comparison
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8vsTechrules Ren 28.4 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTechrules Ren
28.4 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed403 km/h250 mph
- Lightest1,597 kg3,521 lb
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh
- Most powerful1,305 hp973 kW
- Best power-to-weight801 hp/t597 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,070hp798kW | 1,305hp973kW |
| Torque | 1,150Nm848lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,597kg3,521lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.1s99% target: 399 km/h / 248 mph Calculated | 36.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.0s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 670hp/t500kW/t304hp/1000 lb Calculated | 801hp/t597kW/t363hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 720Nm/t482lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | - | 1,067km663mi Calculated |
| Length | 5,137mm202in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,048mm81in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,200mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,724mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,818mm72in |
| Rear track | - | 1,808mm71in |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Seats | 4 | 3 |
| Fuel tank | - | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 16.6 s | - |
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 250 km/h 155 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,070 hp 798 kW |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,305 hp 973 kW |
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh has 235 hp more than McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 and Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh: 235 hp (175 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 403 km/h 250 mph |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 3.0 s |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 3.0 s |
Although Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh has more power, McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh and McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8: 8.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 801 hp/t 597 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,070 hp 798 kW | 3.0 s | 403 km/h 250 mph |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,305 hp 973 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 |
| 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 801 hp/t 597 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,070 hp 798 kW | 1,305 hp 973 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,150 Nm 848 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,067 km 663 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 801 hp/t 597 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 | Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.30 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.94 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,340 L618 US gal515 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,095 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
- Is 33 kg lighter
- Has 88 km/h (55 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh
- Has 235 hp more
- Uses 8.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 131 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























