Lotus Evora Sport 410
Car comparison
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6vsLotus Evora S 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora S
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful410 hp306 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lightest1,337 kg2,948 lb
- Best power-to-weight307 hp/t229 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range619 km384 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score37/100
Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions224 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410hp306kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,337kg2,948lb | 1,442kg3,179lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.5s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 63.3s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 619km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | - | 4,361mm172in |
| Width | - | 2,047mm81in |
| Height | - | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 15.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 has 60 hp more than Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 1,337 kg 2,948 lb |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 269 km/h 167 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 4.1 s |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.7 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 410 hp 306 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,337 kg 2,948 lb | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 619 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 | Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 64 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























