Lotus Evora 400
Car comparison
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6vsLotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora GT430
3.5 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions225 g/km
- Best estimated range619 km384 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Most powerful436 hp325 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight333 hp/t248 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 406hp303kW | 436hp325kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 48.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 333hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 556km345mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,396mm173in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,229mm48in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | 1,564mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | 247g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 10.8 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW |
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V has 30 hp more than Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 556 km 345 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 406 hp 303 kW | 436 hp 325 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 556 km 345 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | 247 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 | Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























