Lotus Evora 400
Car comparison
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6vsLotus Evora 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful406 hp303 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6
- Lightest1,382 kg3,047 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range690 km429 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 406hp303kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 342Nm252lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,382kg3,047lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,782kg3,929lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 64.5s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 690km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,848mm73in |
| Height | 1,229mm48in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | 1,564mm62in | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,557mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 has 126 hp more than Lotus Evora 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 126 hp (94 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 690 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 406 hp 303 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 690 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 | Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Has 126 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
- Has 84 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6
- Is 33 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























