Lotus Evora 400
Car comparison
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6vsLotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora Sports Racer
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful406 hp303 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions225 g/km
- Best estimated range619 km384 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 406hp303kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,436kg3,166lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 606km377mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | - |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,361mm172in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 2,047mm81in |
| Height | 1,229mm48in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | 1,564mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 14.8 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 has 56 hp more than Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 1,436 kg 3,166 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 286 km/h 178 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 606 km 377 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.6 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 406 hp 303 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,436 kg 3,166 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 606 km 377 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 | Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 21 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























