Lotus Emira
Car comparison
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0vsLotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora 400
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful421 hp314 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight289 hp/t216 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range630 km392 mi
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score82/100
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Lightest1,422 kg3,135 lb
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 421hp314kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,422kg3,135lb |
| Gross weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | - |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km392mi Calculated | 619km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,413mm174in | 4,394mm173in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,230mm48in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | 1,624mm64in | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 151L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 421 hp 314 kW |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 has 15 hp more than Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 3.9 s |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 630 km 392 mi |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 421 hp 314 kW | 3.9 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 421 hp 314 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 392 mi | 619 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 151 L 5.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Is 33 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























