Lotus Elise (SERIES 3)
Car comparison
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
SLK 250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest952 kg2,099 lb
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions169 g/km
- Best estimated range822 km511 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 952kg2,099lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 47.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 79.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 231hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 533km331mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 3,824mm151in | 4,134mm163in |
| Width | 1,719mm68in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,117mm44in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 952 kg 2,099 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 533 km 331 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.5 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 952 kg 2,099 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 533 km 331 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 448 kg lighter
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 85 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Has 60 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 289 km (179 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























