Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7vsLotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 3)
S Cup 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Lightest952 kg2,099 lb
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score87/100
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best estimated range810 km503 mi
- Best overall score52/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 952kg2,099lb |
| Gross weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | - |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 47.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 231hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 810km503mi Calculated | 533km331mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | - |
| Length | 4,374mm172in | 3,824mm151in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,282mm50in | 1,117mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,300mm91in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 has 45 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 952 kg 2,099 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 5.7 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 4.6 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 has more power, Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 533 km 331 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 952 kg 2,099 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 810 km 503 mi | 533 km 331 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 277 km (172 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
- Is 408 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























