Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
SLK 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range968 km601 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 810km503mi Calculated | 968km601mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,374mm172in | 4,134mm163in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,282mm50in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300 and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 5.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300 and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 968 km 601 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 810 km 503 mi | 968 km 601 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























