Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5vsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017
300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful247 hp184 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Largest trunk501 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 247hp184kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,787kg3,940lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,309kg5,090lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 46.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 638km397mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,646mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,659mm105in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 501L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,336L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 46.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 has 9 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 6.5 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 750 km 466 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 638 km 397 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 247 hp 184 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 638 km 397 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 501 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 | Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 107 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 112 km (69 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























