Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017
300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range968 km601 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,787kg3,940lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,309kg5,090lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 46.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 968km601mi Calculated | 638km397mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,646mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,659mm105in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 501L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 46.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI has 2 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 968 km 601 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 638 km 397 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 968 km 601 mi | 638 km 397 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 501 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI | Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 329 km (205 mi) more estimated range
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























