Car comparison

Subaru Forester IV 2.0vsLexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Subaru Forester IV

2.0

241 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDTurbochargedSUV2012-2015
VS

Lexus NX I (AZ10)

200t

238 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    779 km
    484 mi
  • Largest trunk
    555 L
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Subaru Forester IV 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    221 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    241 hp
    180 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,613 kg
    3,556 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSubaruForester IV2.0LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
241hp180kW
238hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,613kg3,556lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
2,295kg5,060lb
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
71.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
36.6s
Calculated
44.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
706km439mi
Calculated
779km484mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,595mm181in
4,630mm182in
Width
1,795mm71in
1,845mm73in
Height
1,735mm68in
1,645mm65in
Wheelbase
2,640mm104in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,550mm61in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance
220mm9in
185mm7in
Trunk volume
488L
555L
Max trunk volume
1,577L
1,600L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions-
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Subaru Forester IV 2.0Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200tPowerTorque
  • Subaru Forester IV 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SubaruForester IV2.05,600 rpm2,400 rpm5,850 rpm
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t4,800 rpm1,650 rpm5,700 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSubaruForester IV2.0LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.6 s
44.1 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
241 hp
180 kW
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
238 hp
177 kW

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 has 3 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t.

The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Subaru Forester IV 2.0: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
1,613 kg
3,556 lb
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
221 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.07.5 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t7.3 s

Although Subaru Forester IV 2.0 has more power, Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Subaru Forester IV 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Subaru Forester IV 2.0: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
706 km
439 mi
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
779 km
484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SubaruForester IV2.0
241 hp
180 kW
7.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
238 hp
177 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SubaruForester IV2.0
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
488 L
17.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,630 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SubaruForester IV2.0
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SubaruForester IV2.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SubaruForester IV2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSubaruForester IV2.0LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
241 hp
180 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.3 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,613 kg
3,556 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
488 L
17.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,630 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
Range score
706 km
439 mi
779 km
484 mi
CO2 score
-
178 g/km
Trunk score
488 L
17.2 cu ft
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSubaru Forester IV 2.0Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Subaru Forester IV 2.0

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 72 kg lighter
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 73 km (46 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 67 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Subaru Forester IV 2.0
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
Sport 2.0 T
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
200t
300
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0
2.5 Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
200t
350h
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
200t
450d V8
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
2.0
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
200t
2.0
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
2.0
28i
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsBMWX3 (F25)28i
2.0
28i
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
200t
2.0d
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
Subaru Forester IV 2.0 vs Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t - car comparison - FastVsFaster