Lexus NX I (AZ10)
Car comparison
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200tvsLexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX II (AZ20)
350h
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 239Nm176lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 85.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.1s Calculated | 51.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 128Nm/t86lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,487cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,630mm182in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,645mm65in | 1,670mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,625mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 185mm7in | 195mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 555L | 545L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,436L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 4,800 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 5,700 rpm |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 6,000 rpm | 4,300-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.1 s | 51.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 238 hp 177 kW |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 190 hp 142 kW |
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t has 48 hp more than Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 239 Nm 176 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.3 s |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 779 km 484 mi |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 239 Nm 176 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t | Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 111 Nm more
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 80 km (50 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























