Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015 450d V8vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Lightest2,151 kg4,742 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions189 g/km
- Best economy score85/100
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best estimated range979 km608 mi
- Largest trunk701 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,840kg6,261lb | 2,151kg4,742lb |
| Gross weight | 3,350kg7,385lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 126.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.1s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 979km608mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,461cc272cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 5,065mm199in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,980mm78in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,910mm75in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,635mm64in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 225mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 701L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 93L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 250g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 3,600 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 3,850 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.1 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 137 km/h 85 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 272 hp 203 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8 has 22 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 2,840 kg 6,261 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 8.6 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
Although Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 979 km 608 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 272 hp 203 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,840 kg 6,261 lb | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 979 km 608 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 250 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 701 L 24.8 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 102 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Has 387 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Is 689 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 61 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























