Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20VvsLexus LS III · Facelift 2004 430 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LS III · Facelift 2004
430 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,614 kg3,558 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range977 km607 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 434Nm320lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,614kg3,558lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.1s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 977km607mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 4,293cc262cu in |
| Length | 4,606mm181in | 5,015mm197in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,490mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,925mm115in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 84L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: Power / Torque
- Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5,500 rpm | 1,950-5,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V has 10 hp more than Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5.7 s |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V and Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 636 km 395 mi |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 977 km 607 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 977 km 607 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V | Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 196 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Has 34 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 341 km (212 mi) more estimated range
- Has 146 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























