Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsLexus IS II (XE20) · Facelift 2010 250 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus IS II (XE20) · Facelift 2010
250 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 208hp155kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 252Nm186lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,045kg4,508lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 79.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 774km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,500cc153cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,585mm181in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,545mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 398L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Lexus IS II (XE20) Facelift 2010 250 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 208 hp 155 kW |
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI has 3 hp more than Lexus IS II (XE20) Facelift 2010 250 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus IS II (XE20) Facelift 2010 250 V6 and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 252 Nm 186 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Lexus IS II (XE20) Facelift 2010 250 V6: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Lexus IS II (XE20) Facelift 2010 250 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 774 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 208 hp 155 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | LexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 208 hp 155 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 252 Nm 186 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 774 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 398 L 14.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI | Lexus IS II (XE20) Facelift 2010 250 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 241 km (150 mi) more estimated range
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Lexus IS II (XE20) Facelift 2010 250 V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























