Land Rover Range Rover V SWB
3.0 P400 (Stage 3)
600 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 · Stage 3vsLand Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 · Stage 2vsLand Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 · Stage 1vsLand Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB
3.0 P400 (Stage 2)
520 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present
VS
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB
3.0 P400 (Stage 1)
472 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present
VS
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB
3.0 P400
400 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 3) 600 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque853 Nm629 lb-ft
- Lightest2,379 kg5,245 lb
- Best power-to-weight252 hp/t188 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk725 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW+200 hp | 520hp388kW+120 hp | 472hp352kW+72 hp | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 853Nm629lb-ft+303 Nm | 743Nm548lb-ft+193 Nm | 671Nm495lb-ft+121 Nm | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,379kg5,245lb | 2,379kg5,245lb | 2,379kg5,245lb | 2,379kg5,245lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 271 km/h 168 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 242 km/h150 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.2s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph-16.3 s Calculated | 63.2s99% target: 268 km/h / 167 mph-10.3 s Calculated | 67.4s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph-6.1 s Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s-1.3 s | 4.9s-0.9 s | 5.2s-0.6 s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s-8.1 s Calculated | 16.1s-5.7 s Calculated | 17.9s-4.0 s Calculated | 21.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.7s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.0s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.0s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 252hp/t188kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,052mm199in | 5,052mm199in | 5,052mm199in | 5,052mm199in |
| Height | 1,870mm74in | 1,870mm74in | 1,870mm74in | 1,870mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,997mm118in | 2,997mm118in | 2,997mm118in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,704mm67in | 1,704mm67in | 1,704mm67in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 295mm12in | 295mm12in | 295mm12in | 295mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 725L | 725L | 725L | 725L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,841L | 1,841L | 1,841L | 1,841L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 16.1 s | 17.9 s | 21.8 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 271 km/h 168 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 242 km/h150 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.5 s | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.0 s | 11.2 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 13.0 s | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 600 hp 447 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 520 hp 388 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 472 hp 352 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 400 hp 298 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 3) 600 hp has 200 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 400 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 400 hp and Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 3) 600 hp: 200 hp (149 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 853 Nm 629 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 743 Nm 548 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 671 Nm 495 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 2,379 kg 5,245 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 2,379 kg 5,245 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 2,379 kg 5,245 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 2,379 kg 5,245 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 242 km/h150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 3) 600 hp and Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 400 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 2) 520 hp and Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 1) 472 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 882 km 548 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 882 km 548 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 882 km 548 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 600 hp 447 kW | 4.5 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 520 hp 388 kW | 4.9 s | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 472 hp 352 kW | 5.2 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 242 km/h150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 3) 600 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 3)600 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 2)520 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400 (Stage 1)472 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V SWB3.0 P400400 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 520 hp 388 kW | 472 hp 352 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 853 Nm 629 lb-ft | 743 Nm 548 lb-ft | 671 Nm 495 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 271 km/h 168 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 242 km/h150 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,379 kg 5,245 lb | 2,379 kg 5,245 lb | 2,379 kg 5,245 lb | 2,379 kg 5,245 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 882 km 548 mi | 882 km 548 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 3) 600 hp | Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 2) 520 hp | Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 1) 472 hp | Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 400 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 3) 600 hp
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400 (Stage 2) 520 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover V SWB 3.0 P400
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12