Land Rover Range Rover V LWB
SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)
795 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2022-present
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 · Stage 3vsLand Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 · Stage 2vsLand Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 · Stage 1vsLand Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB
SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)
689 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2022-present
VS
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB
SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)
625 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2022-present
VS
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB
SV 4.4 V8 P530
530 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2022-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3) 795 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful795 hp593 kW
- Highest torque1,163 Nm857 lb-ft
- Lightest2,551 kg5,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight312 hp/t232 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Largest trunk725 L
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 795hp593kW+265 hp | 689hp514kW+159 hp | 625hp466kW+95 hp | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 1,163Nm857lb-ft+413 Nm | 1,013Nm747lb-ft+263 Nm | 915Nm675lb-ft+165 Nm | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,551kg5,624lb | 2,551kg5,624lb | 2,551kg5,624lb | 2,551kg5,624lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.1s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph-12.9 s Calculated | 54.3s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph-7.7 s Calculated | 58.5s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph-3.4 s Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s-1.1 s | 4.0s-0.7 s | 4.2s-0.5 s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.4s-6.2 s Calculated | 12.0s-4.6 s Calculated | 13.3s-3.3 s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s-1.0 s Calculated | 3.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 4.0s-0.4 s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s-1.5 s Calculated | 11.8s-1.0 s Calculated | 12.2s-0.6 s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 270hp/t201kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 456Nm/t305lb-ft/ton Calculated | 397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated | 359Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 5,258mm207in | 5,258mm207in | 5,258mm207in | 5,258mm207in |
| Height | 1,870mm74in | 1,870mm74in | 1,870mm74in | 1,870mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 3,197mm126in | 3,197mm126in | 3,197mm126in | 3,197mm126in |
| Front track | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,704mm67in | 1,704mm67in | 1,704mm67in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 294mm12in | 294mm12in | 294mm12in | 294mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 725L | 725L | 725L | 725L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,727L | 2,727L | 2,727L | 2,727L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | 4.0 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.4 s | 12.0 s | 13.3 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s | 10.3 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.8 s | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph | 192 km/h 119 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 795 hp 593 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 689 hp 514 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 625 hp 466 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 530 hp 395 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3) 795 hp has 265 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 530 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 530 hp and Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3) 795 hp: 265 hp (198 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 1,163 Nm 857 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 1,013 Nm 747 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 915 Nm 675 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 2,551 kg 5,624 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 2,551 kg 5,624 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 2,551 kg 5,624 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 2,551 kg 5,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3) 795 hp and Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 530 hp: 1.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2) 689 hp and Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1) 625 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 750 km 466 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 750 km 466 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 750 km 466 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 795 hp 593 kW | 3.7 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 689 hp 514 kW | 4.0 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 625 hp 466 kW | 4.2 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3) 795 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3)795 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2)689 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1)625 hp | Land RoverRange Rover V LWBSV 4.4 V8 P530530 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 795 hp 593 kW | 689 hp 514 kW | 625 hp 466 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,163 Nm 857 lb-ft | 1,013 Nm 747 lb-ft | 915 Nm 675 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,551 kg 5,624 lb | 2,551 kg 5,624 lb | 2,551 kg 5,624 lb | 2,551 kg 5,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 750 km 466 mi | 750 km 466 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3) 795 hp | Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2) 689 hp | Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 1) 625 hp | Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 530 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 3) 795 hp
- Has 106 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530 (Stage 2) 689 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover V LWB SV 4.4 V8 P530
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12