Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014

Turbo S 4.8 V8

570 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

SVR 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    284 km/h
    176 mph
  • Most powerful
    570 hp
    425 kW
  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,235 kg
    4,927 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    255 hp/t
    190 kW/t
    3.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.9 L/100 km
    14.8 mpg US
    17.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    267 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    870 km
    540 mi
  • Best overall score
    87/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
570hp425kW
550hp410kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
2,235kg4,927lb
2,335kg5,148lb
Gross weight
2,900kg6,393lb
-
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
57.7s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
71.3s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
4.7s
0-200 km/h
13.0s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
4.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb
Calculated
236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton
Calculated
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
870km540mi
Calculated
820km510mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,806cc293cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,855mm191in
4,872mm192in
Width
1,954mm77in
2,019mm79in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,661mm65in
-
Rear track
1,675mm66in
-
Trunk volume
670L
-
Max trunk volume
1,780L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
100L
105L
CO2 emissions
267g/km
298g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V86,000 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
4.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
4.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.0 s
16.7 s
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
193 km/h
120 mph
178 km/h
111 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
570 hp
425 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 has 20 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
2,235 kg
4,927 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
2,335 kg
5,148 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
284 km/h
176 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V84.1 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V84.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
870 km
540 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
820 km
510 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
570 hp
425 kW
4.1 s
284 km/h
176 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,872 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
4.1 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
4.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
4.7 s
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Lightness
2,235 kg
4,927 lb
2,335 kg
5,148 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,872 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
870 km
540 mi
820 km
510 mi
CO2 score
267 g/km
298 g/km
Trunk score
670 L
23.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km22.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi36.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year3,360 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 31 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo S 4.8 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Turbo S 4.8 V8
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.5 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo S 4.5 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster