Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8vsLexus LX III · Facelift 2015 570 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

4.4 SDV8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2020
VS

Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015

570 V8

367 hp5663 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph Unrestricted
    225 km/h
    140 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    740 Nm
    546 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,443 kg
    5,386 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    219 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,024 km
    636 mi
  • Largest trunk
    780 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Power
339hp253kW
367hp274kW
Torque
740Nm546lb-ft
530Nm391lb-ft
Curb weight
2,443kg5,386lb
2,740kg6,041lb
Gross weight
3,200kg7,055lb
3,350kg7,385lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
93.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
110.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
31.5s
Calculated
39.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,024km636mi
Calculated
958km595mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,367cc266cu in
5,663cc346cu in
Length
4,879mm192in
5,065mm199in
Width-
1,980mm78in
Height
1,803mm71in
1,910mm75in
Wheelbase
2,923mm115in
2,850mm112in
Front track
1,693mm67in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,686mm66in
1,635mm64in
Ground clearance
278mm11in
225mm9in
Trunk volume
780L
259L
Max trunk volume
1,686L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
8
Fuel tank
86L
138L
CO2 emissions
219g/km
334g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: Power / Torque
  • Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV83,500 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm3,750 rpm
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V85,600 rpm3,200 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.5 s
39.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
339 hp
253 kW
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
367 hp
274 kW

Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has 28 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 28 hp (21 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
530 Nm
391 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
2,443 kg
5,386 lb
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
2,740 kg
6,041 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV86.9 s
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V87.7 s

Although Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 6.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
1,024 km
636 mi
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
958 km
595 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
367 hp
274 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
8 seats
Trunk
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
5,065 mm
199.4 in
Height
1,910 mm
75.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.9 s
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
367 hp
274 kW
Torque
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
2,443 kg
5,386 lb
2,740 kg
6,041 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
8 seats
Trunk
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
5,065 mm
199.4 in
Height
1,910 mm
75.2 in
Range score
1,024 km
636 mi
958 km
595 mi
CO2 score
219 g/km
334 g/km
Trunk score
780 L
27.5 cu ft
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km25.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi40.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year3,780 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

  • Has 210 Nm more
  • Is 297 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 65 km (41 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 521 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 115 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8

  • Has 28 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 SDV8
Lexus LX III 570 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 SDV8
40i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsBMWX7 (G07)40i
570 V8
300
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
4.4 SDV8
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
570 V8
3.6
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsCadillacXT53.6
4.4 SDV8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
4.4 SDV8
3.0 TFSi V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsBentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6
4.4 SDV8
570 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
570 V8
4.2 V8 FSI
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 FSI
4.4 SDV8
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
570 V8
75D 75 kWh
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsTeslaModel X75D 75 kWh
570 V8
200t
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
4.4 SDV8
3.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 vs Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015 570 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster