Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015 570 V8vsCadillac XT5 3.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XT5
3.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac XT5 3.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,931 kg4,257 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
- Largest trunk850 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best estimated range958 km595 mi
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | CadillacXT53.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 314hp234kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 368Nm271lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,740kg6,041lb | 1,931kg4,257lb |
| Gross weight | 3,350kg7,385lb | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 109.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.9s Calculated | 36.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 958km595mi Calculated | 830km516mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,663cc346cu in | 3,649cc223cu in |
| Length | 5,065mm199in | 4,815mm190in |
| Width | 1,980mm78in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,910mm75in | 1,675mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,638mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,635mm64in | 1,638mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 225mm9in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 259L | 850L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,784L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 8 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 138L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 334g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XT5 3.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 6,700 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | CadillacXT53.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.9 s | 36.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 314 hp 234 kW |
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has 53 hp more than Cadillac XT5 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 53 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 2,740 kg 6,041 lb |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 1,931 kg 4,257 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| CadillacXT53.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 7.7 s |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 7.5 s |
Although Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has more power, Cadillac XT5 3.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 958 km 595 mi |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 830 km 516 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 314 hp 234 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXT53.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacXT53.6 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac XT5 3.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | CadillacXT53.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 314 hp 234 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,740 kg 6,041 lb | 1,931 kg 4,257 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 958 km 595 mi | 830 km 516 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 334 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 259 L 9.1 cu ft | 850 L 30.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 | Cadillac XT5 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.20 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,780 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8
- Has 53 hp more
- Has 162 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 128 km (80 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Cadillac XT5 3.6
- Is 809 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 591 L more trunk volume
- Emits 105 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























