Porsche Macan I (95B)
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,865 kg4,112 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions212 g/km
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score83/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,207 km750 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | - |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 86.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 41.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km449mi Calculated | 1,207km750mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,997cc183cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 4,681mm184in | 4,999mm197in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,690mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,683mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 2,030L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | 212g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,450-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 41.0 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 722 km 449 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 1,207 km 750 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.4 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 449 mi | 1,207 km 750 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 212 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 | Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 495 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 km/h (23 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
- Has 140 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 485 km (301 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























