Car comparison

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P250vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019

2.0 P250

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-present
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,145 km
    712 mi
  • Largest trunk
    314 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
250hp186kW
235hp175kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,942kg4,281lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Gross weight
2,700kg5,952lb
-
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
94.1s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
98.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
39.1s
Calculated
43.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
817km508mi
Calculated
1,145km712mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,597mm181in
4,950mm195in
Width-
1,923mm76in
Height
1,727mm68in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,741mm108in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,636mm64in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,643mm65in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
238mm9in
Trunk volume
157L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,651L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
67L
71L
CO2 emissions-
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P2505,500 rpm1,400-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,740-2,220 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.1 s
43.7 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
90 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 has 15 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
1,942 kg
4,281 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2,205 kg
4,861 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
224 km/h
139 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P2507.8 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D57.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
817 km
508 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
1,145 km
712 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.8 s
224 km/h
139 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.8 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
157 L
5.5 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,727 mm
68.0 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
235 hp
175 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,942 kg
4,281 lb
2,205 kg
4,861 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
157 L
5.5 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,727 mm
68.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
817 km
508 mi
1,145 km
712 mi
CO2 score
-
162 g/km
Trunk score
157 L
5.5 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 263 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 115 Nm more
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 328 km (204 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 157 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 P250
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P250
2.0 P250
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0 D5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 P250
25t
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 D5
45 TDI V6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2.0 P250
550T
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250vsChevroletEquinox III550T
2.0 D5
300
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 P250
2.0
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster