Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5vsLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
2.0 D240
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,016 km631 mi
- Largest trunk1,179 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful247 hp184 kW
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 247hp184kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,934kg4,264lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 98.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 43.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 1,016km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,597mm181in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 2,069mm81in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,727mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 1,179L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,336L | 1,794L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 43.8 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 has 7 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 1,934 kg 4,264 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 6.5 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 750 km 466 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 1,016 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 247 hp 184 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,934 kg 4,264 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 1,016 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 1,179 L 41.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 254 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 266 km (165 mi) more estimated range
- Has 719 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























