Car comparison

Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V · Stage 3vsLancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V · Stage 2vsLancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V · Stage 1vsLancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS
VS
VS
Lancia logo

Lancia Kappa (838)

2.0 Turbo 16V

205 hp1995 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan1994-1998

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3) 307 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    275 km/h
    171 mph
  • Most powerful
    307 hp
    229 kW
  • Highest torque
    462 Nm
    341 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    210 hp/t
    157 kW/t
    4.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3)307 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2)266 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1)242 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V205 hp
Power
307hp229kW+102 hp
266hp199kW+61 hp
242hp180kW+37 hp
205hp153kW
Torque
462Nm341lb-ft+164 Nm
402Nm297lb-ft+104 Nm
364Nm268lb-ft+66 Nm
298Nm220lb-ft
Curb weight
1,465kg3,230lb
1,465kg3,230lb
1,465kg3,230lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
+40 km/h
264 km/h
164 mph
+29 km/h
256 km/h
159 mph
+21 km/h
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
58.9s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph-9.3 s
Calculated
63.8s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph-4.4 s
Calculated
66.6s99% target: 253 km/h / 157 mph-1.6 s
Calculated
68.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s-1.6 s
6.2s-1.1 s
6.6s-0.7 s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
16.4s-10.4 s
Calculated
19.0s-7.8 s
Calculated
21.1s-5.8 s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s-1.5 s
Calculated
5.9s-1.0 s
Calculated
6.3s-0.7 s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.6s-1.6 s
Calculated
14.1s-1.1 s
Calculated
14.5s-0.7 s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb
Calculated
182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton
Calculated
275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,687mm185in
4,687mm185in
4,687mm185in
4,687mm185in
Width
1,826mm72in
1,826mm72in
1,826mm72in
1,826mm72in
Height
1,462mm58in
1,462mm58in
1,462mm58in
1,462mm58in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,700mm106in
2,700mm106in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,546mm61in
1,546mm61in
1,546mm61in
1,546mm61in
Rear track
1,527mm60in
1,527mm60in
1,527mm60in
1,527mm60in
Trunk volume
525L
525L
525L
525L
Doors
4
4
4
4
Seats
5
5
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3) 307 hpLancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2) 266 hpLancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1) 242 hpLancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V 205 hpPowerTorque
  • Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3) 307 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2) 266 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1) 242 hp: Power / Torque
  • Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V 205 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3)307 hp5,000 rpm3,750 rpm5,250 rpm
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2)266 hp5,000 rpm3,750 rpm5,250 rpm
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1)242 hp5,000 rpm3,750 rpm5,250 rpm
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V205 hp5,000 rpm3,750 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3)307 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2)266 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1)242 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V205 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
5.9 s
6.3 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
6.2 s
6.6 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.4 s
19.0 s
21.1 s
26.9 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
264 km/h
164 mph
256 km/h
159 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.4 s
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.5 s
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
12.0 s
12.3 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
14.1 s
14.5 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
112 mph
173 km/h
107 mph
167 km/h
104 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3) 307 hp has 102 hp more than Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V 205 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V 205 hp and Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3) 307 hp: 102 hp (76 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3) 307 hp and Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V 205 hp: 1.6 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2) 266 hp and Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1) 242 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3)307 hp
210 hp/t
157 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2)266 hp
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1)242 hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V205 hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3)307 hp
307 hp
229 kW
5.7 s
275 km/h
171 mph
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2)266 hp
266 hp
199 kW
6.2 s
264 km/h
164 mph
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1)242 hp
242 hp
180 kW
6.6 s
256 km/h
159 mph
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V205 hp
205 hp
153 kW
7.3 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3)307 hp
Power
307 hp
229 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2)266 hp
Power
266 hp
199 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
264 km/h
164 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1)242 hp
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
256 km/h
159 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
LanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V205 hp
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3)307 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 2)266 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 1)242 hpLanciaKappa (838)2.0 Turbo 16V205 hp
Power
307 hp
229 kW
266 hp
199 kW
242 hp
180 kW
205 hp
153 kW
Torque
462 Nm
341 lb-ft
402 Nm
297 lb-ft
364 Nm
268 lb-ft
298 Nm
220 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
6.2 s
6.6 s
7.3 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
264 km/h
164 mph
256 km/h
159 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Trunk score
525 L
18.5 cu ft
525 L
18.5 cu ft
525 L
18.5 cu ft
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
210 hp/t
157 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V (Stage 3) 307 hp

  • Has 41 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V · Stage 3 vs Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V · Stage 2 vs Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V · Stage 1 vs Lancia Kappa (838) 2.0 Turbo 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster