Lancia Delta I (831) · Facelift 1991
HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)
322 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedHatchback1993-1994
Car comparison
Lancia Delta I (831) · Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V · Stage 3vsLancia Delta I (831) · Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V · Stage 1vsLancia Delta I (831) · Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V · Stage 2vsLancia Delta I (831) · Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Lancia Delta I (831) · Facelift 1991
HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)
254 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedHatchback1993-1994
VS
Lancia Delta I (831) · Facelift 1991
HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)
279 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedHatchback1993-1994
VS
Lancia Delta I (831) · Facelift 1991
HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V
215 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedHatchback1993-1994
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3) 322 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful322 hp240 kW
- Highest torque477 Nm352 lb-ft
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk200 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score66/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 322hp240kW+107 hp | 254hp189kW+39 hp | 279hp208kW+64 hp | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 477Nm352lb-ft+169 Nm | 376Nm277lb-ft+68 Nm | 416Nm307lb-ft+108 Nm | 308Nm227lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,340kg2,954lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.4s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph-12.3 s Calculated | 59.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-1.7 s Calculated | 52.8s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph-7.9 s Calculated | 60.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s-1.3 s | 5.1s-0.6 s | 4.8s-0.9 s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.6s-9.5 s Calculated | 18.4s-5.7 s Calculated | 17.3s-6.8 s Calculated | 24.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.9s-0.5 s Calculated | 4.6s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s-1.4 s Calculated | 13.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.0s-0.9 s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 356Nm/t238lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,898mm153in | 3,898mm153in | 3,898mm153in | 3,898mm153in |
| Width | 1,767mm70in | 1,767mm70in | 1,767mm70in | 1,767mm70in |
| Height | 1,365mm54in | 1,365mm54in | 1,365mm54in | 1,365mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,479mm98in | 2,479mm98in | 2,479mm98in | 2,479mm98in |
| Front track | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,504mm59in | 1,504mm59in | 1,504mm59in | 1,504mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 200L | 200L | 200L | 200L |
| Max trunk volume | 940L | 940L | 940L | 940L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 57L | 57L | 57L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3) 322 hpLancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1) 254 hpLancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2) 279 hpLancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V 215 hpPowerTorque
- Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3) 322 hp: Power / Torque
- Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1) 254 hp: Power / Torque
- Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2) 279 hp: Power / Torque
- Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V 215 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.9 s | 4.6 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 5.1 s | 4.8 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.6 s | 18.4 s | 17.3 s | 24.1 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.7 s | 8.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.2 s | 10.9 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 13.3 s | 13.0 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | 322 hp 240 kW |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | 254 hp 189 kW |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | 279 hp 208 kW |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp | 215 hp 160 kW |
Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3) 322 hp has 107 hp more than Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V 215 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V 215 hp and Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3) 322 hp: 107 hp (80 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | 477 Nm 352 lb-ft |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | 416 Nm 307 lb-ft |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp | 308 Nm 227 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3) 322 hp and Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V 215 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2) 279 hp and Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1) 254 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | 322 hp 240 kW | 4.4 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | 279 hp 208 kW | 4.8 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp | 215 hp 160 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3)322 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1)254 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 2)279 hp | LanciaDelta I (831)Facelift 1991HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V215 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 322 hp 240 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | 279 hp 208 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 477 Nm 352 lb-ft | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft | 416 Nm 307 lb-ft | 308 Nm 227 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 5.1 s | 4.8 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 3) 322 hp
- Has 69 hp more
- Has 102 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Lancia Delta I (831) Facelift 1991 HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V (Stage 1) 254 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lancia Delta I (831) HF Integrale Evo 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12