Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder
Car comparison
Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10vsWiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF5
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Most powerful555 hp414 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight378 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions299 g/km
- Best estimated range543 km337 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520hp388kW | 555hp414kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.8s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 51.1s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 24.8L/100 km9.5mpg US11.4mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 331hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb Calculated | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 463Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 471km292mi Calculated | 543km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,961cc303cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,300mm169in | 4,220mm166in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,950mm77in |
| Height | 1,184mm47in | 1,180mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,560mm101in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,592mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 110L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 400g/km | 299g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 5,750-6,250 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 10.8 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 123 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 520 hp 388 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 has 35 hp more than Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10 and Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 311 km/h 193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 4.3 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10: 4.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 471 km 292 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 543 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 520 hp 388 kW | 4.3 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW | 3.9 s | 311 km/h 193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 |
| 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp 388 kW | 555 hp 414 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 471 km 292 mi | 543 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 400 g/km | 299 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10 | Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.75 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.88 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,463 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 101 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























