Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2
Car comparison
Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12vsMaserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Shamal
3.2 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Highest torque436 Nm322 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight246 hp/t184 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 374Nm276lb-ft | 436Nm322lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,417kg3,124lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.3s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 483km300mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,929cc240cu in | 3,217cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,460mm176in | 4,100mm161in |
| Width | 1,730mm68in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,380mm54in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,380mm54in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 420L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 87L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12: Power / Torque
- Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V has 6 hp more than Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12 and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 374 Nm 276 lb-ft |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 6.2 s |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12: 6.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 483 km 300 mi |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 |
| 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 374 Nm 276 lb-ft | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 483 km 300 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12 | Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 18 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 31.50 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 50.69 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,700 L713 US gal594 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,725 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12
- Is 117 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 62 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 212 km (132 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























