Car comparison

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIvsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) · Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

KTM X-Bow GT-XR

2.5 TFSI

500 hp2480 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2023-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) · Facelift 2019

AMG GLC 63 S V8

510 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    295 km/h
    183 mph Unrestricted
    280 km/h
    174 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,130 kg
    2,491 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    442 hp/t
    330 kW/t
    2.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,055 km
    656 mi
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
Power
500hp373kW
510hp380kW
Torque
581Nm429lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,130kg2,491lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Gross weight
1,600kg3,527lb
2,590kg5,710lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
37.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
62.3s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
3.8s
0-200 km/h
9.2s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
3.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
11.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb
Calculated
262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
514Nm/t344lb-ft/ton
Calculated
359Nm/t240lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,055km656mi
Calculated
537km333mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,480cc151cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,626mm182in
4,748mm187in
Width
2,041mm80in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,164mm46in
1,584mm62in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,873mm113in
Front track-
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
90mm4in
164mm6in
Trunk volume
160L
500L
Max trunk volume-
1,400L
Doors
1
5
Seats
2
5
Fuel tank
96L
66L
CO2 emissions-
280g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8PowerTorque
  • KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI6,350 rpm5,550 rpm7,000 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8-1,750-4,500 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
3.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
3.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.2 s
12.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
9.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
11.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
218 km/h
136 mph
195 km/h
121 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
510 hp
380 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8 has 10 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
1,950 kg
4,299 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI3.4 s
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V83.8 s

Although Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8 has more power, KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,055 km
656 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
537 km
333 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
510 hp
380 kW
3.8 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,748 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,584 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
3.4 s
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
3.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8
Power
500 hp
373 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Fuel consumption
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,748 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,584 mm
62.4 in
Range score
1,055 km
656 mi
537 km
333 mi
CO2 score
-
280 g/km
Trunk score
160 L
5.7 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Is 820 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 181 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 518 km (322 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 S V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 TFSI
GT3 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0
AMG GLC 63 S V8
AMG GLC 63 S
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 S
2.5 TFSI
GT3 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024GT3 4.0
AMG GLC 63 S V8
AMG GLC 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43
2.5 TFSI
GT4 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0
AMG GLC 63 S V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
2.5 TFSI
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsAston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
AMG GLC 63 S V8
55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
2.5 TFSI
3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
AMG GLC 63 S V8
AMG GLE 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 S V8
2.5 TFSI
Competition 3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsBMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
AMG GLC 63 S V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI vs Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) · Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 S V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster