Maserati GranTurismo II
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6vsKTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKTM X-Bow GT-XR
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Lightest1,130 kg2,491 lb
- Best power-to-weight442 hp/t330 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score82/100
Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed302 km/h188 mph
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 496hp370kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 581Nm429lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,130kg2,491lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 37.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.0s | 9.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 514Nm/t344lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,055km656mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,992cc183cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,959mm195in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,957mm77in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,164mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,929mm115in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,647mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 90mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 96L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 6,350 rpm | 5,550 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.0 s | 9.2 s |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 218 km/h 136 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 496 hp 370 kW |
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW |
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI has 4 hp more than Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6 and KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 581 Nm 429 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 3.9 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 3.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 442 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | 496 hp 370 kW | 3.9 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6 | KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 496 hp 370 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 581 Nm 429 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,055 km 656 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 442 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6
- Has 19 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 665 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 166 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























