Car comparison

Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6vsKTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati GranTurismo II

Modena 3.0 V6

496 hp2992 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-2026
VS

KTM X-Bow GT-XR

2.5 TFSI

500 hp2480 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Most powerful
    500 hp
    373 kW
  • Lightest
    1,130 kg
    2,491 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    442 hp/t
    330 kW/t
    2.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
496hp370kW
500hp373kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
581Nm429lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,130kg2,491lb
Gross weight-
1,600kg3,527lb
Top speed
302 km/h
188 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
75.0s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph
Calculated
37.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
3.4s
0-200 km/h
13.0s
9.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
3.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.9s
Calculated
10.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb
Calculated
442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton
Calculated
514Nm/t344lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,055km656mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,992cc183cu in
2,480cc151cu in
Length
4,959mm195in
4,626mm182in
Width
1,957mm77in
2,041mm80in
Height
1,353mm53in
1,164mm46in
Wheelbase
2,929mm115in
2,850mm112in
Front track
1,647mm65in
-
Rear track
1,660mm65in
-
Ground clearance-
90mm4in
Trunk volume
310L
160L
Doors
2
1
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
70L
96L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIPowerTorque
  • Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V66,500 rpm3,000 rpm6,750 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI6,350 rpm5,550 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.7 s
3.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
3.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.0 s
9.2 s
Top speed
302 km/h
188 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
4.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
9.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.9 s
10.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
192 km/h
119 mph
218 km/h
136 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6
496 hp
370 kW
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI has 4 hp more than Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6 and KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
581 Nm
429 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,130 kg
2,491 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6
302 km/h
188 mph
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V63.9 s
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI3.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6
496 hp
370 kW
3.9 s
302 km/h
188 mph
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6
Power
496 hp
370 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
302 km/h
188 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,959 mm
195.2 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
496 hp
370 kW
500 hp
373 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
3.4 s
Top speed
302 km/h
188 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
Fuel consumption
-
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,959 mm
195.2 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
Range score
-
1,055 km
656 mi
Trunk score
310 L
10.9 cu ft
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6

  • Has 19 Nm more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 150 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 665 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 166 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Maserati GranTurismo II Modena 3.0 V6 vs KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster