Car comparison

Lamborghini Huracan EVO · Facelift 2019 5.2 V10vsKTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lamborghini Huracan EVO · Facelift 2019

5.2 V10

610 hp5204 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2020-2024
VS

KTM X-Bow GT-XR

2.5 TFSI

500 hp2480 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    340 km/h
    211 mph Unrestricted
    325 km/h
    202 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    610 hp
    455 kW
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    38/100

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Highest torque
    581 Nm
    429 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,130 kg
    2,491 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    442 hp/t
    330 kW/t
    2.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
610hp455kW
500hp373kW
Torque
560Nm413lb-ft
581Nm429lb-ft
Curb weight
1,389kg3,062lb
1,130kg2,491lb
Gross weight-
1,600kg3,527lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
57.7s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph
Calculated
36.8s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.3s
3.4s
0-200 km/h
9.3s
9.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.2s
Calculated
3.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
10.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
439hp/t327kW/t199hp/1000 lb
Calculated
442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
403Nm/t270lb-ft/ton
Calculated
514Nm/t344lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,055km656mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,204cc318cu in
2,480cc151cu in
Length
4,520mm178in
4,626mm182in
Width
1,933mm76in
2,041mm80in
Height
1,165mm46in
1,164mm46in
Wheelbase
2,620mm103in
2,850mm112in
Ground clearance-
90mm4in
Trunk volume-
160L
Doors
2
1
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
96L
CO2 emissions
330g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIPowerTorque
  • Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V108,000 rpm6,500 rpm8,250 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI6,350 rpm5,550 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.2 s
3.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.3 s
3.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.3 s
9.2 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
35.0 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.8 s
4.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.2 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.2 s
9.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
10.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
218 km/h
135 mph
219 km/h
136 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
610 hp
455 kW
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW

Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 has 110 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10: 110 hp (82 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
581 Nm
429 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
1,389 kg
3,062 lb
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,130 kg
2,491 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V103.3 s
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI3.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 and KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10: 4.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
439 hp/t
327 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
610 hp
455 kW
3.3 s
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
Power
610 hp
455 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,165 mm
45.9 in
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
Power
610 hp
455 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
3.3 s
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
3.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10
439 hp/t
327 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
610 hp
455 kW
500 hp
373 kW
Torque
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.3 s
3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
1,389 kg
3,062 lb
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
Fuel consumption
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,165 mm
45.9 in
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
Range score
-
1,055 km
656 mi
CO2 score
330 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
439 hp/t
327 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Consumption13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.15 LC100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi38.87 LC100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,623 LC/year2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10

  • Has 110 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Has 21 Nm more
  • Is 259 kg lighter
  • Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lamborghini Huracan EVO 5.2 V10
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.2 V10
5.2 V10
VS
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10vsLamborghiniHuracan TecnicaFacelift 20225.2 V10
2.5 TFSI
GT3 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0
5.2 V10
5.2 V10
VS
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10vsLamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10
2.5 TFSI
GT3 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024GT3 4.0
5.2 V10
5.2 V10
VS
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10vsLamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10
2.5 TFSI
GT4 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0
5.2 V10
5.2 V10
VS
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10vsLamborghiniHuracan LP 610-45.2 V10
2.5 TFSI
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsAston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
5.2 V10
5.2 V10
VS
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10vsLamborghiniHuracan LP 580-25.2 V10
2.5 TFSI
3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
5.2 V10
5.2 V10
VS
LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10vsLamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10
2.5 TFSI
Competition 3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsBMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
Lamborghini Huracan EVO · Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 vs KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster