Car comparison

Nissan 370Z Roadster · Facelift 2012 3.7 V6vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan 370Z Roadster · Facelift 2012

3.7 V6

328 hp3696 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedRoadster2012-2017
VS

KTM X-Bow GT

2.0 Turbo

285 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    847 kg
    1,867 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    336 hp/t
    251 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    27/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
328hp245kW
285hp213kW
Torque
363Nm268lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,574kg3,470lb
847kg1,867lb
Gross weight
1,885kg4,156lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
77.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
20.1s
Calculated
17.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
208hp/t155kW/t95hp/1000 lb
Calculated
336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
661km410mi
Calculated
482km299mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,696cc226cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,250mm167in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,845mm73in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,325mm52in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,550mm100in
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,550mm61in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,595mm63in
1,626mm64in
Trunk volume
140L
-
Doors
2
-
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
72L
40L
CO2 emissions-
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V67,000 rpm5,200 rpm7,250 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.1 s
17.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
169 km/h
105 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
328 hp
245 kW
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW

Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6 has 43 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6: 43 hp (32 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
1,574 kg
3,470 lb
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
847 kg
1,867 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V65.8 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo4.1 s

Although Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6 has more power, KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6: 1.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
661 km
410 mi
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
482 km
299 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
328 hp
245 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW
4.1 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
Power
328 hp
245 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
140 L
4.9 cu ft
Length
4,250 mm
167.3 in
Height
1,325 mm
52.2 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
Power
328 hp
245 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
5.8 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
4.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
328 hp
245 kW
285 hp
213 kW
Torque
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,574 kg
3,470 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
140 L
4.9 cu ft
Length
4,250 mm
167.3 in
Height
1,325 mm
52.2 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
661 km
410 mi
482 km
299 mi
CO2 score
-
189 g/km
Trunk score
140 L
4.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6

  • Has 43 hp more
  • Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 179 km (111 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Has 57 Nm more
  • Is 727 kg lighter
  • Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 128 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.7 V6
3.7 V6
VS
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6vsNissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6
2.0 Turbo
Cup 250 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
3.7 V6
3.7 V6
VS
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6vsNissan370Z CoupeFacelift 20123.7 V6
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
3.7 V6
3.7
VS
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6vsNissan370Z3.7
2.0 Turbo
S 3.4
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsPorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
3.7 V6
3.5i V6 24V
VS
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6vsNissan350Z Roadster (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V
2.0 Turbo
Cup 260 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
3.7 V6
SLK 350 V6
VS
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 350 V6
2.0 Turbo
3.7 V6
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
2.0 Turbo
1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotus2-Eleven1.8
3.7 V6
2.5 TFSI
VS
Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6vsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
Nissan 370Z Roadster · Facelift 2012 3.7 V6 vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster