Koenigsegg CCX
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8vsRimac Concept One 90 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRimac Concept One
90 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8
- Fastest top speed400 km/h249 mph
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight806 hp/t601 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score48/100
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Most powerful1,224 hp913 kW
- Best practicality score37/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032hp770kW | 1,224hp913kW |
| Torque | 1,060Nm782lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.2s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated | 33.7s99% target: 351 km/h / 218 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.1s | 2.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.9s | 6.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s Calculated | 2.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 806hp/t601kW/t366hp/1000 lb Calculated | 644hp/t480kW/t292hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 828Nm/t554lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 318km198mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,700cc287cu in | - |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,146mm163in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,114mm44in | 1,070mm42in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,563mm101in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | 115mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 2.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.1 s | 2.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 24.9 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 6.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 8.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 9.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 221 km/h 138 mph | 255 km/h 159 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,224 hp 913 kW |
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh has 192 hp more than Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8 and Rimac Concept One 90 kWh: 192 hp (143 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 355 km/h 221 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 3.1 s |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 2.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Concept One 90 kWh and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 644 hp/t 480 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 3.1 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,224 hp 913 kW | 2.5 s | 355 km/h 221 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | RimacConcept One90 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 1,224 hp 913 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,060 Nm 782 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.1 s | 2.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 318 km 198 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 644 hp/t 480 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 38.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 61.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,775 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8
- Is 620 kg lighter
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Has 162 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
- Has 192 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























