Koenigsegg CCR
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32VvsZenvo ST1 6.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonZenvo ST1
6.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Most powerful1,102 hp822 kW
- Highest torque1,430 Nm1,055 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range676 km420 mi
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed395 km/h245 mph
- Lightest1,180 kg2,601 lb
- Best power-to-weight683 hp/t509 kW/t1.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | ZenvoST16.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 806hp601kW | 1,102hp822kW |
| Torque | 919Nm678lb-ft | 1,430Nm1,055lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,180kg2,601lb | 1,688kg3,721lb |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 46.5s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 371 km/h / 231 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.5s Calculated | 8.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 683hp/t509kW/t310hp/1000 lb Calculated | 653hp/t487kW/t296hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 779Nm/t521lb-ft/ton Calculated | 847Nm/t567lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 471km292mi Calculated | 676km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,719cc288cu in | 6,800cc415cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,665mm184in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,020mm40in | 1,198mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 3,055mm120in |
| Ground clearance | - | 110mm4in |
| Max trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 69L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 6,900 rpm | 5,700 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 6,900 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | ZenvoST16.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.5 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 17.5 s | 27.8 s |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 246 km/h 153 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 806 hp 601 kW |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 1,102 hp 822 kW |
Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8 has 296 hp more than Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V and Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8: 296 hp (221 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 919 Nm 678 lb-ft |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 1,430 Nm 1,055 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 1,688 kg 3,721 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 375 km/h 233 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 3.2 s |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 3.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8 and Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8 and Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: 6.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 653 hp/t 487 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 471 km 292 mi |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 676 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 806 hp 601 kW | 3.2 s | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 1,102 hp 822 kW | 3.0 s | 375 km/h 233 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V |
| 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
| ZenvoST16.8 V8 | 653 hp/t 487 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | ZenvoST16.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 806 hp 601 kW | 1,102 hp 822 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 919 Nm 678 lb-ft | 1,430 Nm 1,055 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | 1,688 kg 3,721 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 471 km 292 mi | 676 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 653 hp/t 487 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V | Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.75 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.88 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,463 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
- Is 508 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Zenvo ST1 6.8 V8
- Has 296 hp more
- Has 511 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 206 km (128 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























