Car comparison

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8vsKoenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Koenigsegg CCX

R 4.8 V8

1032 hp4800 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turbo2010-2010
VS

Koenigsegg CCR

4.7 i V8 32V

806 hp4719 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    410 km/h
    255 mph
  • Most powerful
    1,032 hp
    770 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,080 Nm
    797 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    806 hp/t
    601 kW/t
    1.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    120 L
  • Best performance score
    96/100

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V

  • Lightest
    1,180 kg
    2,601 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    13.0 L/100 km
    18.1 mpg US
    21.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    471 km
    292 mi
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best economy score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    37/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
Power
1,032hp770kW
806hp601kW
Torque
1,080Nm797lb-ft
919Nm678lb-ft
Curb weight
1,280kg2,822lb
1,180kg2,601lb
Top speed
410 km/h
255 mph
395 km/h
245 mph
To 99% top speed
100.5s99% target: 406 km/h / 252 mph
Calculated
46.5s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.9s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
8.8s
7.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.8s
Calculated
3.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.5s
Calculated
10.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
806hp/t601kW/t366hp/1000 lb
Calculated
683hp/t509kW/t310hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
844Nm/t565lb-ft/ton
Calculated
779Nm/t521lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
318km198mi
Calculated
471km292mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,800cc293cu in
4,719cc288cu in
Length
4,293mm169in
4,293mm169in
Width
1,996mm79in
1,996mm79in
Height
1,114mm44in
1,020mm40in
Wheelbase-
2,660mm105in
Ground clearance
100mm4in
-
Trunk volume
120L
-
Max trunk volume-
120L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
70L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32VPowerTorque
  • Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V87,000 rpm5,600 rpm7,250 rpm
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V6,900 rpm5,700 rpm7,150 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.8 s
3.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.9 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
8.8 s
7.5 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
25.1 s
17.5 s
Top speed
410 km/h
255 mph
395 km/h
245 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
4.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.9 s
8.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.5 s
10.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
221 km/h
137 mph
246 km/h
153 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,032 hp
770 kW
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
806 hp
601 kW

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 has 226 hp more than Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 226 hp (169 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,080 Nm
797 lb-ft
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
919 Nm
678 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
1,180 kg
2,601 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
410 km/h
255 mph
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
395 km/h
245 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V82.9 s
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V3.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 and Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
806 hp/t
601 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
683 hp/t
509 kW/t
1.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
318 km
198 mi
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
471 km
292 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,032 hp
770 kW
2.9 s
410 km/h
255 mph
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
806 hp
601 kW
3.2 s
395 km/h
245 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Power
1,032 hp
770 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
410 km/h
255 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,114 mm
43.9 in
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
Power
806 hp
601 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
395 km/h
245 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,020 mm
40.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Power
1,032 hp
770 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
410 km/h
255 mph
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
Power
806 hp
601 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
395 km/h
245 mph
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK
2.9 s
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
3.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
806 hp/t
601 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
683 hp/t
509 kW/t
1.5 kg/hp
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
Power
1,032 hp
770 kW
806 hp
601 kW
Torque
1,080 Nm
797 lb-ft
919 Nm
678 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.9 s
3.2 s
Top speed
410 km/h
255 mph
395 km/h
245 mph
Lightness
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
1,180 kg
2,601 lb
Fuel consumption
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,114 mm
43.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,020 mm
40.2 in
Range score
318 km
198 mi
471 km
292 mi
Trunk score
120 L
4.2 cu ft
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
806 hp/t
601 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
683 hp/t
509 kW/t
1.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKoenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
Consumption22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km38.50 LC100 km29.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi61.96 LC100 mi47.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,775 LC/year4,463 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8

  • Has 226 hp more
  • Has 161 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 123 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V

  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 152 km (95 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 vs Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster